The MIND Diet -- Dead and Buried -- or Reborn?

In Beating the Dementia Monster, we looked forward to what was to be the definitive study on the MIND diet. The research project was looking to recruit 600 participants, and it appeared that we could expect to see results in April, 2021. The research was a collaboration of Rush University, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the National Institute on Aging. I was very hopeful for some solid, scientific support for the validity of the MIND diet.  

And then covid happened.

Covid threw a monkey wrench into a lot of plans, including this one. In fact, if you go to the study’s web site, you’d think the research is still underway. The web site stands frozen in time. But they did finally publish the results in July 2023, and the results were disappointing. Some vegan YouTubers were a bit gleeful about this, primarily (it seems to me) because the diet allowed for consumption of some fish and poultry. 

I wrote before that I was disappointed in the quality of the study, because it was compromised by covid restrictions. In my view, some of the adjustments they made to the research protocol impaired data collection and assurance of the validity of the data. After reading the research, it didn’t appear to me that they really knew what people were actually eating with an appropriate level of accuracy. Some took the research results to indicate that the diet really didn’t work to reduce the risk of Alzheimer’s, at least not any better than the Mediterranean diet. But not me.  

So perhaps I’m vindicated in resisting the negative interpretation of the results. Recent research at the University of Hawaii (my wife’s alma mater) used data drawn from 93,000 US adults, of which 21,000 developed Alzheimer’s. The study found that adherence to the MIND diet by members of the general population resulted in a 9% reduction in Alzheimer’s risk. But those of White, Black, and Latino descent experienced a 13% reduction. However, people who improved their adherence to MIND over 10 years (including those who didn’t follow the diet closely at first) had a 25% lower risk of dementia compared to those whose adherence declined. Data for the study was drawn from the research cohort known as the Multiethnic Cohort Study which began in the 1990s. This study was also an initiative of the University of Hawaii, but its original goal was to study the demographics of cancer.  

Now, the MIND diet had not yet been formulated in the 1990s. So this is obviously a longitudinal study in which they analyzed information regarding a large population and looked for correlations between diet and the development of Alzheimer’s. The late Dr. Martha Clare Morris developed the MIND diet based on similar research that she and her team conducted. She describes her research in her book, Diet for the Mind.  

Noteworthy about this new research is that adherence to the diet had relatively little effect on Americans of Asian and Native Hawaiian descent. Positive results were seen in White, Black, and Latino populations. The researchers speculated that this may be because the ethnic foods of Asian and Native Hawaiian cultures was already somehow protective of the brain. And you’re looking for the difference in outcome between what people normally eat and a specialized diet. But if both diets are protective of the brain, you won’t see anything that suggests the MIND diet improved anything. But … as they always say ... more research is necessary.  

The new research hasn’t been published, but it was to have been presented at NUTRITION 2025, the conference of the American Society for Nutrition, this past Monday, June 2, in Orlando. I presume all went according to plan.